Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On January 25, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of two million won by the Seoul Western District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Highest 2019 highest 2763;

A. On November 12, 2019, around 19:30 on November 12, 2019, the Defendant destroyed the above car owned by the said victim by using Di30 car owned by the said victim, which is a dangerous object that the victim C(34 years of age) who is a friant in the street B prior to the Jeju city, would not go to the commitment hours, and would receive the front part of the E car owned by the said victim two times more and make it difficult for the market to repair the said car.

B. The Defendant suffered property damage.

A. The time limit set forth in subsection (a) above

As described in paragraph (1), if the car owned by the above victim was destroyed and damaged, the company listed as the advertising company for the operation of the above victim was up to B B at the Jeju city, and the office fixtures such as the computer and monitoring books owned by the above victim were destroyed and damaged by the market price.

2. 20 highest 369;

A. On November 12, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) (U.S.) driving a motor vehicle with D i 30-lanes around 19:29 on November 12, 2019, led directly to H-sections from G to H-sections depending on three-lanes of the three-lane road in Jeju

In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the right and the right by keeping the safety distance from the driver of the motor vehicle while maintaining the safety distance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without securing the safety distance with the preceding vehicle, neglected the duty of front-time watch and went through the same lane due to occupational negligence, and neglected the duty of front-time watch, took part of the back-hand part of the victim I (the 48-year-old driver)'s driving of the Jdsacker drive of the victim I (the 48-year-old driver's right-hand part of the said i30-day driver's driving, and caused the above victim to do so for about two weeks.