logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.05.25 2017고단3323
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car A7 car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or the equivalent) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (or any subsequent action after an accident).

On July 25, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 07:30 on July 25, 2017, driving the two-lane road prior to D at Jeju, along the direction of the offline market in the direction of the offline.

The Defendant, prior to the same direction, followed the F i30 car driven by the victim E (n, 44 years old) in the same direction, and thus, in such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to take care of the driver of the vehicle with the safety distance to avoid when the vehicle stops, to secure the safety distance to avoid when the vehicle stops, and to prevent the accident by properly operating the brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to operate the operation system and failed to properly operate the operation system, and led the vehicle behind the vehicle A7 car that the Defendant driven by the Defendant, and due to the shock, the Defendant got the victim G (I, 25 years old) who was stopped in the front of the vehicle I 30 in the front of the vehicle A7 car that was driven by the Defendant.

At the same time, the Defendant: (a) by such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment; and (b) at the same time, upon the victim G, the Defendant suffered from the victim G about three weeks of treatment, chills, tensions, etc.; and (c) at the same time, the said i30 automobiles were damaged to the extent that the repair cost of KRW 2,760,998, to the extent that the said 1,518,647 car was damaged to the extent that the said rocketing car was repaired to the extent of KRW 1,518,647, respectively, and left the site without taking necessary measures, such as

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) while driving a car at a place specified in paragraph (1) and at a place, the Defendant damaged the Hrocketing car managed by the victim G due to occupational negligence to the extent of KRW 1,518,647 of the repair cost.

(i) the evidence;

arrow