1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part corresponding to D Co., Ltd., a joint plaintiff of the court of first instance who did not appeal, but did not appeal). Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article

(Other grounds for the plaintiffs' assertion in the trial are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court is re-examineed, the first instance judgment rejecting the plaintiffs' assertion is recognized as legitimate).

(a) turn the third and fourth “this Court” into the first instance court;

(b) the 3rd page “B 1 to 22” shall be changed to “B 1 to 23 evidence (including all of the numbers).”

(c) in Part 4, “Do to the Defendant”, the fourth and Twelve of which are referred to “Do to the Defendant”;

The 7th sentence " was pronounced" in the 16th sentence was sentenced, and the appeal was filed with the Supreme Court (2018Do16257) but the appeal was made on November 23, 2018 and the judgment of dismissal of the Supreme Court became final and conclusive as it is.

E. The following is added between the 10th 12th 12 and 13th 13th 16th 4th 61, 137, 161, and 186th 7th 4th 4th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 4th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 2th 2th 2th 3th 4th 4th 4th 7th 4th 7th 4th 2th

However, as seen earlier, G's employees are in the transportation company that entrusted workplace skill development training without providing trainees with relevant teaching materials.