1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. All appeals costs are borne by the Plaintiffs.

3. The plaintiffs.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows.

The 3rd part of the first instance judgment, the 4th part, 5th part, 7th part, and 6th part of the 3rd part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 2nd part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 2nd part of the 19

In addition to the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, all parts written as "the plaintiffs" in the judgment of the court of first instance in addition to the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance are all written as "A, plaintiffs B, C, and D".

The third part of the judgment of the first instance is "Plaintiff C, D, and M" in the second part of the judgment of the first instance.

The entry of Gap evidence Nos. 22 through 33 in the column of "founded ground for recognition" of Nos. 16 and 17 of the first instance judgment shall be added to the column of "founded ground for recognition" and the following shall be added to the 3rd page No. 7:

“3) On April 21, 2019, A had died while the trial was in progress, and the plaintiffs taken over the lawsuit.

The following is added to the 15th sentence of the judgment of the first instance. The Plaintiffs asserted that this case’s motion picture (Evidence No. 1) submitted by the Defendants was operated. However, the evidence submitted by the first instance court is insufficient to acknowledge the above assertion even if the evidence submitted by the Defendants showed each of the evidence No. 34 and 35, and there is no other evidence.

The plaintiffs' assertion in this part is without merit.

The 16th to 10th of the first instance judgment is as follows. The 1st of the 19th of the first instance judgment is as follows.

In conclusion, property damage incurred to A due to the instant accident is KRW 4,964,80 (=1,900,000).

【The scope of the Defendants’ liability for damages against A is KRW 5,464,80,00 (i.e., property damage KRW 4,964,80,00). A died on April 21, 2019 and died on April 21, 201, and Plaintiff B, the wife of which was 3/9, Plaintiff C, D, and M, the children of the Defendants.