A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant entered into a contract on the consignment of a mobile phone with the victim E, a representative of “D” who operates a mobile phone sales store in the name of “C” in substantial Gu of Cheongju-si, and entered into the contract on the consignment of a mobile phone with the victim E.

The Defendant forged an application for joining a mobile phone under the name of another person using personal information kept in custody, and submitted it to the said victim to the said victim, and had the victim receive sales commission, etc. as if he had induced new customers.

1. On October 8, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) around October 8, 2012, the Defendant stated “F and G” in the form of application for mobile phone admission using a verification-type pen; and (b) signed F on the side of the name.

Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged an application form for joining a mobile phone in F, a private document with respect to rights and obligations, and forged 19 copies of the application form for joining a mobile phone in F, a total of 19 times from around that time to May 20, 2013, as shown in attached Table C, from around that time.

2. Around October 8, 2012, the Defendant at the event of the aforementioned investigation document submitted to E an application for subscription to a mobile phone in the name of F, which was forged, as described in paragraph (1), from the above “C” to the use of the forged fact, and submitted an application for subscription to a mobile phone in the name of another person, which was forged 19 times in total, from around that time to May 20, 2013, to E, as indicated in the list of crimes.

3. The Defendant, from October 8, 2012 to May 20, 2013, submitted to the victim E an application for total of 19 mobile phones as indicated in the annexed crime list.

However, as in paragraph (1), the defendant submitted an application for admission to a forged mobile phone without the consent of the nominal owner, and accordingly, he/she shall be paid a sales fee for the mobile phone in return for deceiving the victim as if he/she had induced new customers.