logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 02. 15. 선고 2016두57489 판결
(심리불속행)부동산 매매대금채권 중 일부회수 불가능[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Gwangju High Court-2015-Nu-643 ( October 06, 2016)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho Jae-2014-Lighting-4050 ( November 6, 2014)

Title

(A) Partial recovery of real estate purchase price bonds is impossible.

Summary

(C) If the transfer value of each real estate of this case is objectively clear that some of the transfer value of each real estate of this case cannot be recovered, the entire disposition is revoked.

Related statutes

Article 96 of the Income Tax Act

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are examined.

The argument regarding the appeal is clearly without merit because it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow