logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 04. 27. 선고 2017두32265 판결
(심리불속행)보험금지급채권이 조건부채권으로서 압류 대상이 되는지[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Gwangju High Court-2016-Nu-1276 ( December 05, 2016)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho-2014-Mining-4985 ( December 15, 2014)

Title

(C) Whether the claim for insurance money is conditional and subject to seizure.

Summary

(b) Where the policyholder has designated a beneficiary upon the death of the policyholder, the claim for insurance money is conditional bonds as stipulated in Article 43 of the Enforcement Decree of the National Tax Collection Act and can be seized.

Related statutes

Article 39 (Accretion Year, etc. of Gross Income and Necessary Expenses)

Cases

2017Du32265 Disposition rejecting the refund of value-added tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

A Kim a

Defendant-Appellee

The Director of the North Korean Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju High Court-2016-Nu-1276 ( December 5, 2016)

Imposition of Judgment

2017.27

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are examined.

The argument regarding the procedure of appeal does not include the reasons prescribed in the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure of Appeal.

Since the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow