1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Basic Facts

Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicle B (hereinafter “Copied vehicle”) with respect to the vehicle B (hereinafter “Copied vehicle”).

Around 08:45 on November 25, 2009, the Chin-do vehicle moved to the left-hand side of the Emp vehicle from the front side of the Empon elementary school located in Heak-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, to the Empon Police Station. On the left-hand side of the above vehicle, the vehicle re-convened with A (hereinafter referred to as “the Emponer”) a F- same transportation vehicle, a vehicle driving on the second line of the vehicle adjacent to the vehicle, where the vehicle was traveling to the left-hand side, and the vehicle re-convened with A (hereinafter referred to as “the Emp vehicle”).

(hereinafter “instant accident”). A person who was an employee belonging to the same transportation company, filed an application for medical care benefits and compensation under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act with the Plaintiff on the ground that he/she suffered brain ties type, cerebral he/shemal he/she, brain-resistant transfusion, and she suffered pain due to the instant accident that occurred while performing duties.

On March 11, 2010, the Plaintiff determined that it does not constitute an occupational disease on the ground that it is difficult to deny the fact that there was a apparent physiological change in the business environment due to the fear of the victim's unexpected and unexpected difficulties at the time of the instant accident, such as flooding, and the sudden change in the business environment. The Plaintiff determined that the cerebral chronological type does not constitute an occupational disease on the ground that it is difficult to recognize the proximate causal relation with the work or disaster due to the congenital disease.

The Plaintiff paid 29,042,70 won as temporary layoff benefits, 43,684,50 won as medical care benefits, 13,050,880 won as nursing benefits, and 116,120,643 won as disability benefits.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through Gap evidence 9, Gap.