logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.11.18 2012가단207392
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a special corporation established by the Minister of Employment and Labor pursuant to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”), which is entrusted with the industrial accident compensation insurance business by the Minister of Employment and Labor to promptly and fairly compensate for occupational accidents of workers, and is a person who provided insurance benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act to victims A (hereinafter “victims”). The Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. is an insurance company of Maritime Vehicle B (hereinafter “Maritime Vehicle 1”) and the Defendant East Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. is an insurance company of Maritime Vehicle C (hereinafter “Maritime Vehicle 2”).

B. On November 25, 2009: around 45, 08: Around 45 minutes, at a private distance without signal prior to a restaurant located in Heak-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, an accident occurred where one of the vehicles operating from the enclosed Elementary School to the bank of the Heak Police Station located in the vicinity of the Jakdong Police Station, and the one of the two-lanes of the vehicles operating from the right side of the vehicle 1 to the left side of the two-lanes of the vehicle 2(C Emp vehicle) and the other side of the vehicle 2(C Emp vehicle was shocked to the left side of the vehicle 2(F bus) and the other side of the vehicle 2(hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. In the G hospital on the day of the instant accident, the victim took two CT photography, and as a result of the shooting, the blood marisome type (cerebral marisome type) on the right side was observed, but there was no opinion of the intention of protopy or cerebral resistant transfusion.

On the date of the accident, the victim returned home with no particular problem as a result of the CT photographing.

However, on November 26, 2009 following the day of the instant accident, the person was hospitalized in the Chungcheong University Hospital on his own, and the examination results such as the two parts of the CTgraph were diagnosed with brain-resistant typosis, hydropathy, and cerebral typosis. The labor typology type was previously owned by the victim.

E. The plaintiff is engaged in brain-resistant blood transfusion and mathy.

arrow