logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.06.13 2018노786
폭행등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendant to the penalty (three million won of a fine) is too unhued and unfair.

2. The Defendant’s crime of this case as to the grounds of appeal was committed by the Defendant, which committed the crime of this case against the victim’s judgment, by putting in the ground floor the height of the equipment displayed above the equipment possessed by the victim, which told the victim to see in front of the restaurant while drinking alcohol at the restaurant operated by the victim, and falling off. In particular, on June 16, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime of this case against the crime of damaging property at the Ulsan District Court for the same kind of violence and 40 times, and in particular, on the other hand, even though he was under suspension of execution after being sentenced to imprisonment for five months due to the obstruction of execution, and for the suspension of execution for two years, the possibility of criticism and the risk of recidivism is very high.

다만 피고인이 이 사건 범행을 자백하고 있고, 원심에서 피해자에게 30만 원을 주고 합의하였으며, 피해자가 이에 더하여 피고인이 고령이고 생활이 어렵다는 사정을 들어 피고인에 대한 고소를 취소하기도 한 점, 피고인은 아내를 여읜 뒤 기초생활수급에 의존하여 혼자 컨테이너에서 생활하고 있으며 알코올의존증 등으로 건강 또한 그리 좋아 보이지 않는 점 등 그 밖에 피고인의 연령, 성행, 환경, 이 사건 범행에 이르게 된 동기와 경위, 그 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 양형의 조건이 되는 모든 사정들을 참작하여 보면, 원심이 선고한 형이 너무 가벼워서 부당하다고 보이지는 아니한다.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow