logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.17 2017고단7930
위조유가증권행사등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On September 30, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for two years and ten months with prison labor due to the commission of false securities at the Seoul Central District Court on September 30, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 8, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On September 17, 2015, the Defendant, at the first floor of the Nonghyup Bank D branch in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, the Defendant exercised one check number, 120 million won at the face value, '120 million won at the same seat of the National Bank', 'the issue date at the Dong branch of the National Bank', 'the Dong branch of the Bank', 'the issuer', 'F representative director G', 'the issuer', 'the representative director G', which was forged, at the point of entry into the deposit account of the GS Kwix H branch, and exercised this by allowing Kwikset service articles to deliver the said bank staff I as genuinely formed.

2. On September 16, 2015, the Defendant attempted to commit fraud by posting a phone call from the staffJ of GS K H H branch to the injured party at an infinite location, thereby purchasing KRW 100 million to KRW 150 million.

On September 17, 2015, the NH Bank made a false statement that it will deposit the merchandise coupon price in the domestic bank and collect merchandise coupons, and had Kwikset service engineer deposit one check per face value of KRW 120 million in the account of the victim's deposit in the account of the victim's name at the No. 1 branch of Nonghyup Bank D, as stated in paragraph 1.

However, in fact, the defendant deposited a forged check with the intention of receiving gift certificates equivalent to the face value of the check from the injured party, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price of the gift certificates normally.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the employees of the victim company as above and attempted to deliver gift certificates worth KRW 120 million from the victim's damage. However, it was discovered that it was a forged check, and that it was not an attempted check.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the defendant or K by the prosecution;

1. Police with respect to L.

arrow