Defendants are not guilty.

1. Defendant B, a new citizen of the facts charged, and Defendant C, a ship-sailand, was a new citizen of the Republic of Korea in early 2009, and Defendant C, a new citizen of the Republic of Korea, paid five million won to Defendant B in return for the lawful stay in Korea by acquiring the nationality of the Republic of Korea through a disguised marriage, even though there is no genuine intention of marriage.

In addition, Defendant A received 300,000 won from Defendant B in return for introducing Defendant B and Defendant C, and introduced Defendant B and Defendant C, etc., the Defendants were able to make a false marriage report between Defendant B and Defendant C.

Accordingly, on March 5, 2009, Defendant B and Defendant C prepared a marriage report as if Defendant B and Defendant C were actually married in the family register of the Gangnam-gu civil service center of the Gangnam-gu civil service office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and had the public official in charge of such circumstance submit the above marriage report along with related documents, such as the marriage report in the name of the Chinese government, and had the public official in charge record the marriage of Defendant B and Defendant C in the family register file of Defendant B.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false report to the public official and made the same public electronic record as the family register to be entered, and exercised by allowing the public official to keep it at a place around that time.

2. The burden of proof of the facts charged in a criminal trial for judgment is to be borne by the prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on evidence of probative value, which makes a judge not having reasonable doubt as to whether the facts charged are true, to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the suspicion of guilt against the defendant is between the

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(1) The Defendants, such as the Health Team and the facts charged, conspired with each other, to the extent that the Defendants conspired with each other (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do2823, Aug. 21, 2001).