logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2013.10.31 2013고정329
명예훼손등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Criminal History (Defendant A)

1. Defendant A, around 20:00 on April 20, 2012, around the F hotel located in Pyeongtaek-si E, took an attitude that the victim B had expressed a view that he would inflict any danger, such as taking the victim’s bath on the ground that the victim B sold the same kind of goods as that of the Defendant’s funeral service after entering the Defendant’s funeral service area. The victim took 60 Scarfs equivalent to the market value of the victim’s 50,000 won against the victim’s will.

2. Defendant A, at around 21:00 on May 26, 2012, took an attitude of doing harm and injury to the victim B, such as taking a bath at the same place as the above 1. Paragraph (1) on the same grounds as the above. Defendant A had 70,000 won at the market price of the victim for sale, and had 70,000 won at the level against the victim’s will.

3. Defendant A, at around 21:00 on May 30, 2012, took an attitude of 21:0 as seen in the above 1. Paragraph 1., on the same ground as in the above 1.3, Defendant A, on the part of the victim B, had the degree of 70,000 won of the market price of the victim for sale, scarf and 70,000 won against the victim’s will, thereby reconcing the victim B, and had the victim go against the land and faced with the victim B, thereby requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

4. At around 21:00 on June 16, 2012, the Defendant took an attitude of 50,000, at the same place as the above 1. Paragraph 1 of the same Article, i.e., taking the victim B’s abusive language, etc. on the same grounds as the above 1.1, and she took over the degree of 50,000 won (50,000 won) and 50,000 won (50,000 won) at the market

5. On June 16, 2012, the Defendant listened to several persons, including H, in the presence of the U.S. military unit in Pyeongtaek-si, and the fact that the victim B did not have a franchising act by the head of the G branch.

arrow