Defendant

C and D shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. From March 2, 2012 to January 2, 2013, Defendant C lent the Defendant’s national technical qualification witness computer application construction system technician (registration number): G and special construction technology career certificate (H), which is a career certificate, to A, the representative of the stock company B, respectively, and received KRW 300,000 per month.

2. The Defendant leased the Defendant’s national technical qualification witness electronic application construction system technician (registration number): and the primary construction technology career certificate (J) career certificate, which is the construction technology career certificate, to A, the representative of the Co., Ltd. from around B, 2010 to October 18, 2013, respectively, and received KRW 200,000 per month.

3. Defendant A

A. The Defendant violated the National Technical Qualifications Act and the Construction Technology Management Act: (a) from around B, 2010 to October 18, 2013, leased each of the national technical qualification certificates and the construction provisional license certificates from C and D, as described in paragraphs (1) and (2), at the office of the corporation located in the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan Government K from around B, Busan.

B. On July 13, 2012, the Defendant violated the Framework Act on the Construction Industry prepared and submitted a list of construction technology manpower possession status as if C and D were employees of the Company B, as described in paragraphs 1 and 2, at the Dong-gu Office located in the Busan Dong-gu, Busan, and as described in paragraphs 1 and 2.

4. B Defendant B Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of facility maintenance and management, aesthetic works, waterproofing and cooking work, and painting work business.

The Defendant violated the National Technical Qualifications Act, at the time and place stated in paragraph 3(a) of the Construction Technology Management Act, and at the same time and place, A, the representative of the Defendant, committed the same act as described in paragraph 3(a).

B. The Defendant violated the Framework Act on the Construction Industry, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 3(b), committed the Defendant’s violation as described in Paragraph 3(b).

Summary of Evidence

1..