logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.06.13 2018구합67443
지장물 매수 협의 거부처분 취소 등
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim against the Defendant Sungnam City and the part of the claim against the Defendant Sungnam City.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant Sungnam-si is the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Acquisition of Land for Public Use and the Compensation for Loss (amended by Act No. 6656, Feb. 4, 2002; hereinafter “former Special Act on Public Use”).

(B) in accordance with this paragraph, the land purchased from Jung-dong and Fdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si (hereinafter Defendant Sung-nam-dong-dong-si

(2) The Plaintiffs were cultivated by leasing and cultivating each of the pertinent lands located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant lands”) prior to the acquisition of Defendant Sungnam-si’s ownership as indicated in the following table. At present, the Plaintiffs currently own obstacles to each of the instant lands.

Plaintiff

On February 24, 1998, the land category size (unit size: 2,879, G G G G G, which is the acquisition date of ownership in Sungnam-si, and the acquisition date of ownership, was concluded on February 24, 1998, and on March 12, 1998, No. 3,649, which was acquired through consultation on February 25, 1998, 3, 502, which was acquired through consultation on February 25, 1998, and 3, which was deferred annually from around 1999 to April 9, 201, the Plaintiffs purchased the land of this case for the reason that they did not obtain permission of the central government office from around 199 to around 198.

2) around June 2006, Defendant Sungnam-si established a plan to create Lpark on the instant site. However, around November 2010, the pertinent project was suspended, and around 2014, the instant site was incorporated into M and decided to provide citizens with the instant land. C. Defendant Sungnam-si around October 2014, as it was planned to use each of the instant land as M after the expiration of the lending contract period, Defendant Sungnam-si was to remove the obstacles and deliver each of the instant land to the Plaintiffs.

arrow