beta
Text
1. The defendant
A. The Plaintiff B’s KRW 2,106,00 as well as 5% per annum from December 9, 2004 to August 28, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
(a) Business approval and public notice - Business Name: G (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): The public notice of the Gyeonggi-do public notice on October 25, 2004 H, April 14, 2008, the Gyeonggi-do public notice I, the J of Gyeonggi-do public notice on October 21, 201, and the Gyeonggi-do public notice on August 1, 201, and the project implementer K of Gyeonggi-do public notice on August 1, 201: Defendant.
B. The Plaintiff’s land partially incorporated into the Plaintiff’s land is divided into the instant project, and only part of the land was incorporated into the instant project, which is divided into the Plaintiff’s land, N,O land, P land owned by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s clan, the Plaintiff’s P land owned by Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si (hereinafter “ Qu”), the Plaintiff’s land owned by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s S land, and the Plaintiff’s land owned by the Plaintiff F.
(B) The incorporated land shall be deemed to be “the instant incorporated land” and the incorporated land shall be deemed to be “the instant remaining land”; when referring to the individual land, it shall be deemed to be specified as Dong and lot number. Plaintiff A’s non-divided land M 2935㎡ M 1956m2 after the partition before the ownership is divided, and Plaintiff B N 208m2, 751m200,000,000,000,000,0000,0000,0000,000,000,000,000,000: (a) the remaining land incorporated into a 138m2,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
C. The Plaintiffs filed a claim with the Central Land Expropriation Committee for compensation for losses from the remaining land of this case, but the Central Land Expropriation Committee dismissed all of the Plaintiffs’ applications for the adjudication on compensation for losses from depreciation of the remaining land of this case on July 17, 2014.
(hereinafter referred to as “adjudication of Expropriation”). [The ground for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, and the number with Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9 is included;