beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share the amount of KRW 13,798,96 to Plaintiff A, as well as the amount thereof, from November 4, 2014 to September 26, 2017.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. In fact, the Defendants were indicted of summary facts with the following criminal facts (hereinafter “instant tort”), and on June 12, 2015, issued a summary order that each of the Defendants was punished by a fine of KRW 2,50,000 due to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Joint Injury) No. 2015 High Court Decision 2015 High Court Decision 20837, Jun. 12, 2015, and the above summary order became final and conclusive around that time.
(1) On November 4, 2014, while the Defendants were staying home by proxy driving around 02:00 on November 4, 2014, the Plaintiff A, a proxy driver of the Gangnam-gu, Seoul, had a light on the ground that a taxi in the vicinity of Gangnam-gu, Seoul, prevents the Defendants from driving his/her vehicle. The Plaintiff A, who was leading to this, sound “any ring.”
The Defendants listened to the sound of the Plaintiff’s bath, and Defendant C took the Plaintiff’s face and body at a time and taken the Plaintiff’s body by drinking, and Defendant D took the Plaintiff’s face at a time when the Plaintiff’s face was taken by drinking. Defendant D went beyond the Plaintiff’s floor, and caused injury to the Plaintiff A, such as a non-fringing so that the Plaintiff may receive approximately four weeks of treatment.
(2) At the date, time, and place in the above paragraph (1) above, the Defendant D saw that the Plaintiff’s assault against the Plaintiff C as a mobile phone was taken, and the Plaintiff D her scambling the Plaintiff B’s hand, pushed the Plaintiff B’s hand, pushed the Plaintiff B over the floor, and then her head was scambling the Plaintiff B, thereby making the Plaintiff’s head a drinking, and she was scambling with the Plaintiff B for about two weeks.
B. According to the facts of recognition of liability, the defendants are jointly liable for damages incurred by the plaintiff A due to the tort in this case, and the defendant D is liable for the damages incurred by the plaintiff B.
C. The Defendants’ limitation of liability against Plaintiff A: Provided, That the Plaintiff’s act of taking a bath was deemed to contribute to the occurrence of the tort in this case.