logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.17 2016가합3532
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 180,651,726 among the Plaintiff and KRW 33,880,000 among the Plaintiff, shall be KRW 70,057,90 from June 28, 2015.

Reasons

A. As to the part of the plaintiff 1 and the plaintiff 2, the plaintiff 1 and the plaintiff 1

b) prepare a standard subcontract agreement for construction works (basic, modified);

1. Project owner: F company B (Defendant) the name of the E prime contract in the e-mail of Gyeonggi-do: it is obvious that it is a clerical error in the EJ;

H, Construction of a new neighborhood living facility other than I

2. The name of the subcontracted project: The project for installing miscellaneous iron, windows and glass; and

3. Place of work: it is obvious that it is a clerical error in the EJ in the time of harmony;

H, I, and G

4. Construction period: Amount of contract on June 30, 201 on January 15, 2014: Value-added tax of 220,000,000 won: Value-added tax of 20,000,000 won: 20,000,000 won.

6. Orders for materials and payment of prices (a) and (b) omitted;

(1) Payment shall be made within 30 days from the date of the completion of the adjustment in accordance with the contents and proportion of such adjustment within 30 days from the date of such adjustment, and such payment shall be made within 2% of the month of such non-payment.

(7) through 10.1. Special specifications * Chang, Miscellaneous products of Miscellaneous Corporation, other than basic contracts, will be added to the accounts.

The construction cost shall be settled as a substitute for the K Housing Site.

is written in writing.

(hereinafter omitted)

D. On December 30, 2014, the Defendant completed each registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Plaintiff with respect to the land size of 364 square meters designated by the Plaintiff with respect to the land size of 364 square meters which was owned by the Defendant due to the payment in lieu of the construction price pursuant to the 4th unit subcontract on a pre-construction.

On February 25, 2016, the Plaintiff spent the total amount of KRW 56,081,976 as the expense for repayment of the debt with the right to collateral security, in order to cancel the right to collateral security established on each land subject to payment in kind.

Meanwhile, from March 10, 2014 to March 27, 2015, the Defendant paid a total of KRW 50,300,000 to the Plaintiff or M as designated by the Plaintiff.

E. Since then, at the Defendant’s request, the Plaintiff’s miscellaneous iron, windows, and glass materials for the Opent, P art gallery, Q North America, R, and S Housing (hereinafter each of the above real estate is referred to as “five post-construction”).

arrow