The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the punishment imposed by the lower court (six months of imprisonment) was too unreasonable, each of the instant crimes was committed by the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant entered a restaurant or a main place operated by another person and repeated an unfoldion. The Defendant did not know even though he was under the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime, and committed a second offense only for two months since the judgment became final and conclusive, in light of the circumstances leading up to the crime, methods and repetition of the crime, etc., the liability for the crime was very heavy, in light of the fact that the amount of damage was relatively small, but the Defendant did not make any effort to repay the damage up to the present time, and did not receive a letter from the victimized person, the lower court does not recognize that the sentence imposed on the Defendant for the reasons stated in its reasoning is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.