The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the punishment sentenced by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) was too unreasonable, the instant crime was committed by the Defendant, along with A, a co-defendant of the lower court, by causing injury to the victims, and the Defendant did not directly look at the victims due to beer disease.

However, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of this case, including the fact that the victims have exercised considerable tangible power, such as drinking or launchinging the victims from the A side where the beer's disease was displayed, and that the crime was very heavy, even though the victims have suffered considerable physical and mental damage, they did not make any effort to recover damage up to the present time, and did not receive a letter from the victims, it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable because the punishment imposed by the defendant for the reasons stated in its reasoning is too excessive.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, "H" in Article 11 of the 2th sentence of the judgment of the court below ex officio shall be corrected to "E".