The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the punishment imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment, confiscation) was too unreasonable, the instant crime was committed by the Defendant on the ground that it was committed in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and the theory of changes, including the following: (a) the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the lower court for the reason that it was too unreasonable; (b) the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the Defendant is too unreasonable because the Defendant’s punishment imposed on the Defendant for the reason that the Defendant was frightened by drinking or launchinging the previous students without justifiable cause; and (c) the crime was committed by intimidation or threatening by excessive use; (d) the nature of the crime was extremely poor in light of the method of crime, the part and degree of injury; and (e) the victim did not make any effort to recover damage up to the present time even though he

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.