The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the fact-finding (not guilty part of the judgment of the court below) that the defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender on the ground that he infringed upon the victim's residence, and was released upon the recommendation that he would find the victim's house, it was immediately found in the victim's house, and that when the defendant started to find the victim's house before that time, he was threatened by the victim's request to the effect that he would return to the victim's house again, but at that time of the instant case, he was threatened by the victim's "I will die", and that the victim's report to the police was made by the police, and that he and his father were killed and discarded, and that he requested the personal protection while attending the court of the court of the court of the court below, this part of the charges can be recognized.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 120 hours of community service) is too unfasible and unfair.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. The summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant invaded upon the victim C’s residence on July 15, 2017; (b) was arrested in the act of committing an act of committing an offense and was released at around 15:30 on the same day after being arrested by the police; and (c) was released at around 15:30 on the same day; and (d) was found again at around 16:50 on the same day to kill the victim’s house, and thus, he would die.

Doing to die all of his or her family members, “I am to die or die,” and “I am to die or die.”

“Islable”, “Islable”

In other words, “the victim or his/her father or son(8 years) seems to be detrimental to the life or body of the victim or his/her father or son(8 years old).”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim for the purpose of retaliation against police reports.

B. Determination 1) In full view of the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated, the lower court asserts by the Defendant.