Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul Administrative Court-2017-Gu Group-2083 ( October 17, 2017)
Case Number of the previous trial
Cho High Court Decision 2016Do3640 ( December 15, 2016)
Title
When a combined transfer of a house consisting of non-taxable houses and commercial buildings is made, the calculation method of non-taxable housing gains shall be based on the standard market price.
Summary
Where land and buildings are transferred in a lump sum, gains on transfer shall be kept separately, and where the transfer value of land and buildings cannot be distinguished from the transfer value, each standard market price ratio shall be divided, and where a building is combined, the standard market price of the housing part, the standard market price of the building part, and the standard market price of the building part shall be the individual publication price.
Related statutes
Article 89, 99, and 100 of the Income Tax Act, Article 154, and Article 166 of the Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act
Cases
2017Nu51411 Revocation of disposition of imposing capital gains tax
Plaintiff
KimA
Defendant
O Head of tax office
Conclusion of Pleadings
September 15, 2017
Imposition of Judgment
September 29, 2017
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. On August 1, 2016, the Defendant revoked the part exceeding 111,800 won of the imposition of capital gains tax of 31,719,400 won (including additional tax) for the Plaintiff for the year 2015 (the Plaintiff partially reduced the purport of the claim and appeal in the trial).
Reasons
1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;
The reason for this judgment is that the first instance court's decision is identical to that of Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where the first instance court's decision "the disposition of this case exceeds 11,800 won" as "the part exceeding 111,80 won out of the disposition of this case", and the 4th 17th 17th 17th 17th 17th 1.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.