Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, for one year, for one year, and for eight months, for each of the defendants C.

, however, the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates the Friju station at the time of debate with E and Dong business known to the general public. G, the business owner of the above station, is a person who is a business owner of the above station, and Defendant B is a manager of the above station, and Defendant C, H, and I are employees of the above station.

The Defendants conspired to sell fake transit to unspecified customers who find the aforementioned gas stations with E, G, H, I, and the above gas stations, and share their respective roles as above. From April 25, 2012, the Defendants share their respective roles.

6. From around 29.29 to the above gas station, similar transit [it has been manufactured by mixing about 37 kinds of petroleum products (e.g., transit with other petroleum products)] 79,153 liters (it has been supplied with approximately 140,021,657 won at a market price) from sales in the name of the gas station, and in the manner of injecting the vehicle with a secret storage tank connected with a secret storage tank connected with a secret storage tank in which similar transit is stored, it was sold to the above gas station and stored the remainder in the above gas station.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The defendants and I's written statements of each prosecutor's interrogation protocol as to each prosecutor

1. Sales lending and borrowing table and daily sales day table;

1. Where he/she knows the result of the quality inspection of petroleum products;

1. Investigation report (specific relation to the quantity of fake petroleum manufactured);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 44 subparagraph 3 of Article 44 and Article 29 (1) 1 of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, collectively, in relation to facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment;

1. Suspension of execution (Defendant B and C) Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of favorable circumstances to the Defendants among the reasons for sentencing below)

1. In the case of Defendant A with the reason of sentencing Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order (Defendant B and C), Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc., the substantial nature of the gas station in this case.