1. The defendant is about 143,355,250 won to the plaintiff Youngdo Construction Industry Co., Ltd. and about 137,733.

1. Presumed factual basis

A. The Plaintiffs, including a general contract and the conclusion of a contract by the number of vehicles, constitute a joint supply and demand organization representing the Plaintiff Youngdo Construction Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Youngdo Construction Industry”), and constitutes a joint supply and demand organization (the investment ratio shall be 51% of the Plaintiff Youngdo Construction Industry and the Plaintiff An advanced comprehensive construction company (hereinafter “Plaintiff advanced construction”).

On December 30, 2004, with respect to the road expansion and packing works from Dong to Dong (hereinafter “instant construction works”), the Defendant entered into an overall contract with the Defendant for each of the first units of vehicles (including value-added tax) with the construction period of KRW 2,913,020 (including value-added tax) from December 31, 2004 to December 30, 2005 as the construction period of the construction period of KRW 2,913,020,000 (hereinafter “instant construction works”). At the same time, the Defendant entered into an overall contract with the construction period of KRW 7,254,384,00 (including value-added tax) from December 31, 2014 to December 30, 2006.

The overall contract of this case was concluded by the method of long-term continuing construction (the total construction cost determined by a successful bid, etc. shall be additionally stated, and each of the multiple contracts shall be specified in the same manner as the overall contract, the overall contract and the multiple contracts, respectively, and the overall contract, respectively, and the changes in the overall contract and the overall contract of this case shall be specified in the same manner as the overall contract, and the multiple changes in the overall contract). The detailed changes in the overall contract and the overall contract of this case are as shown in attached Table 1.

The scheduled completion date of the instant construction project was December 30, 2006, but the scheduled completion date of the construction project was extended on August 14, 2013 due to the Defendant’s lack of budget and civil petitions during the process of performing the construction project.

The Plaintiffs completed the instant construction on August 14, 2013, and delivered the facilities completed to the Defendant.

B. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant of the general conditions of the construction contract at local governments and the Defendant conclude a contract from December 30, 2004 to December 2007, 2007 under the accounting rules of the “former General Conditions of the Construction Contract” by the first type of tea contract.