1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A corporation KRW 219,905,510, and to the plaintiff B corporation KRW 37,293,916 and each of the said money.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiffs, including the conclusion of the instant construction contract, and C Co., Ltd. constituted a joint supply and demand organization with the representative of Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”), and the ratio of investment was 45%, C Co., Ltd., 45%, and Plaintiff B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) 10% at the time of the initial contract, and later changed to Plaintiff A85.5% on June 28, 2010 and Plaintiff B 14.5% on June 28, 2010.

On November 29, 2004, with respect to the construction work between the Defendant and D (hereinafter “instant construction work”), the construction period was set from December 3, 2004 to December 31, 2004, and the construction cost of KRW 100,000,000 was set at KRW 10,000,000, and at the same time, the contract was entered into between December 3, 2004 and November 2, 2010 at the same time as the contract was entered into by the first type of tea and the total construction period was set at KRW 52,085,00,000.

The overall contract of this case was concluded by the method of long-term continuing construction (the total construction cost determined by a successful bid, etc. shall be additionally stated, and each of the multiple contracts shall be specified in the same manner as the "general modification contract", "long-term continuing construction contract", "long-term continuing construction contract", and "long-term continuing construction contract" as stated in attached Table 1). The detailed amendment details of the instant large-term continuing construction contract and the overall contract are as shown in attached Table 1.

Although the scheduled completion date of the instant construction project was November 2, 2010, the final completion date of the construction project was extended on November 19, 2014 due to the Defendant’s fault, such as changes in the design, reflection of the budget increase due to changes in the project cost, civil petitions, etc., and the final completion date of the construction project was extended.

The Plaintiffs completed the instant construction work on November 19, 2014, and submitted relevant documents to the Defendant, such as the completion inspector and the completion specifications.

This is among the general conditions of the instant construction contract under the instant construction contract, which serve as the content of the instant construction contract.