logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.08.29 2015가합51651
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant is about 97,226,292 won to the plaintiff same construction company and about 17,157.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiffs are the same construction company (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s same construction”) as the Plaintiff.

) Forming a consortium representing the representative (the investment ratio is 85% for the same construction of the plaintiff and the comprehensive construction company for the plaintiff's Gu residents (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff's comprehensive construction") is 15% for the plaintiff's residents

[2] On December 18, 2007, the construction work for the purification work of a natural-type river in the Eastcheon-si (hereinafter “the construction work”) between the Defendant and the Defendant is called the construction work of this case

As to the gold construction period, from January 4, 2008 to December 31, 2008, the total construction period shall be three years from the commencement date of the construction, and the construction contract under the method of a long-term contract with a total construction amount of KRW 1,610,00,000, total construction amount of KRW 12,706,470,000 (hereinafter “the instant contract”).

(2) The Plaintiffs commenced the instant construction project on January 4, 2008, and extended the construction period to the scheduled completion date on July 10, 2014. In the process, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant concluded each of the instant construction contracts and amendments as stated in the attached Table 1 of the Change in the Construction Contract.

(3) The Plaintiffs completed the instant construction work on July 10, 2014 and completed the completion inspection. (B) The Plaintiffs and the Defendant included the Plaintiffs’ general terms and conditions of the instant construction contract into the general terms and conditions of the local self-government organization construction contract at the time of the instant contract; and (c) the part related to the instant issue is as indicated in attached Table 2. The Defendant receiving the payment of the price for the completion of the instant construction work from the Plaintiffs on January 22, 2009 (the first number of vehicles), December 2, 2009 (the second number of vehicles contracts), August 6, 2010 (the third number contracts), January 31, 2011 (the second number contracts).

. The contract amount;

arrow