Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

In relation to the election of the head of the DDR on February 5, 2013, the defendant was requested by E and E to carry out an election campaign from E and E who were candidates for the above election, and was engaged in an election campaign for E.

No one shall provide money, goods, entertainment or other property benefits to an elector, with the intention of having a specific person elected or not to be elected as an executive officer for district fisheries cooperatives.

Nevertheless, at around 20:30 on December 26, 2012, the Defendant, in the vicinity of the H's house located in G on December 26, 2012, was thought to request support from E in relation to the above D's election, and 200,000 won in cash to the members of D's fisheries cooperatives.

As a result, the Defendant provided money to H, who is an elector, for the purpose of getting E to be elected as the head of the D fisheries cooperative.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each testimony of the witness H and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Relevant Article 178 (1) 2, and Article 53 (1) 1 of the Fisheries Cooperatives Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of fines (the amount of money provided and the equality of cases similar thereto);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant's assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the provisional payment order is that since the defendant's "Tingu would sell to the defendant" and 200,000 won should be applied to H, it does not provide money to a specific person for

In this regard, the following circumstances, i.e., the 30th day after the lapse of four days from December 26, 2012 from the date on which H received money from the Defendant, i.e., the 11st day of the same month, following the lapse of four days from December 26, 2012.