Defendant

A, B, and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

except that this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On December 1, 2015, the Defendant was present at the prosecutor’s office of the Defendant case (a group, deadly weapons, etc.) against Defendant H (hereinafter “instant judgment”) in violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapons, etc.) against Defendant H (hereinafter “instant judgment”) in the Suwon District Court, which was located in the parallel of Pyeongtaek-si, 15:0 on December 1, 2015, around 15, 1036, in the court of law No. 236.

The Defendant, at the time of the prosecutor’s questioning, “I have a fact that there was a fighting on his body” with the Defendant’s “I have no written answer to the fact that I had a fighting on his body.”

The defense counsel testified to the effect that “A witness is not the head of a witness due to his/her illness” to the effect that he/she respondeded to “a example” on July 4, 2015, i.e., “at the J restaurant located in Pyeongtaek-si I to be the head of H from his/her illness.”

However, on July 4, 2015, at around 22:00, the Defendant was injured by the head of H from the J restaurant to the main soldier.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

B. On July 6, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Defendant’s instant case (hereinafter “instant appellate judgment”), such as violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapons, etc.) against the Defendant, at the Suwon District Court No. 210, which was 120, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant, at around 15:30, around July 6, 2016.

Defendant’s “A witness who was a prosecutor of this case”

On July 4, 2015, at the J cafeteria, there is a summary that Defendant H had the head from Defendant H to his disease.

“I shall not answer the question “...”

The answer to "," and the counsel's "the witness was the head from the defendant at the first police investigation to the main illness."

Madernity, and later, the prosecutor's investigation or court did not have any fact.