logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.19 2018고단3517
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 5, 2018, around 14:30, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the case, such as attempted fraud of No. 4201 C (C and D) of the Seoul Central District Court, which was located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court 157 (Seo-dong, Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court 422, the above court 2017 No. 4201 C (C and D).

Defendant (C) at the time when the Defendant purchased a credit card DB (Database) necessary for the foregoing Article and received the credit card Lbter’s flag from E (E and F). It is essential that Defendant (E) took any role in relation to this issue.

I cannot answer the question "........"

The answer to “,” and the counsel “if so, the Defendant played a role in connection with the instant case.”

There is no participation in the question "......."

“The answer was made.”

The defendant continued to be the witness of the prosecutor E and crime, and the witness of the prosecutor was also the same as the defendant C, the witness has been why the defendant C has been distorted.

I think it was necessary to do so.

It is known that “I have sent another question”.

Then, the Prosecutor did not know that Defendant C would come into Korea before entering Korea through the Incheon Airport on January 12, 2017.

The answer was made to the question of “....”, and whether “C has been in Korea” was first known in Korea at that time.

The prosecutor asked the prosecutor’s question “.......”.

However, prior to entry into the Republic of Korea, the Defendant had been aware that C would be also involved in the crime by entering the Republic of Korea, and C was actively involved in the crime by forging credit cards and forging credit cards, such as by linking G as a supplier of credit card terminals, which is a supplier of credit card terminals.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement;

arrow