logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.01.14 2013고단4039
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2013, the Defendant acquired one resident registration certificate owned by the victim D, which was lost by the victim D in his/her own apartment park at his/her government around the end of June, 2013.

The Defendant, without taking necessary procedures such as returning the goods acquired as above to the victim, embezzled them in a way that he or she had on his or her own mind.

2. On July 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had the intent to open a Handphone using the victim’s resident registration certificate obtained as referred to in the preceding paragraph; (b) had the signature of F in F, E, the Government of the Republic of Korea around July 30, 2013, using a new service contract for the Handphone joining; and (c) a contract for the service of the Handphone joining at that place using a click-type pen in Chapter 2 of the contract for the service of the Handphone joining; and (d) “D” in the name column of the customer information applied for membership, “G” in the resident registration number column, “H of Gyeonggi-do Government” in the column of the resident registration number; and (d) written “D” in the column of the

As a result, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the new contract for the Handphone subscription service in the name of private document D, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and two copies of the terminal installment contract.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as in the preceding paragraph, delivered to the victim I, who is an employee of the Handphone agency, who is aware of the forgery, a new contract for the Handphone subscription service and two copies of the cell phone subscription contract, as if they were the document duly formed.

4. The fraud accused presented to the victim I the same date, time, place, such as Paragraph 2, D’s resident registration certificate obtained from the victim I, as in Paragraph 1, and the new contract for the Handphone license service in the name of the Handphone, and the two parts of the terminal installment contract, which were forged, as in Paragraph 2, are presented to the victim, and as if he/she was his/her own three villages, "D is a back. D. Aback is opened through the Handphone in the name of the back, and a back will receive the back on the phone."

arrow