beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
On July 3, 2014, A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on July 3, 2014, and the said judgment was finalized on July 11, 2014.
"2015 Highest 244"
1. The Defendants’ co-offenders of the Defendants were private villages. At around 03:00 on February 21, 2015, the Defendants came to a F cafeteria operated by the victims E in the Gun of the Gun of the Gun of the Gun of the Gun of the Gun of the Gun, and invaded into the restaurant through the window not locked after the restaurant, and they cut off with 380,000 won in cash and 6 passbooks owned by the victims in the Gun of the Gun of the Gun of the Gun, from that point to that point.
3. By July 1, 200, a total of KRW 401,00,00 was stolen or attempted by the same method as indicated in the annexed List 1.
As a result, the Defendants committed a theft or attempted theft of the victims' property jointly.
2. At around 04:00 on November 27, 2014, Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant committed a theft of the property amounting to KRW 2,816,00,00 in total on three occasions, including, from that time to February 2, 2015, the following: (a) at the I Office operated by the Victim H in Nam-si, Namyang-si; (b) after subtracting the shock network located in the following office from the double hand, the Defendant intruded into the body through an unlocked window; and (c) at least 2,50,000 won in cash owned by the victim in the face of his/her book; (d) one unlocked hand over the market price; and (e) one was stolen with one document bags; and (e) from that time, by means of the same method as indicated in attached Table 2, the property amounting to KRW 2,816,0
Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victims' commercial buildings at night and stolen the victims' property.
"2015 Highest 385"
3. On January 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 07:10, the Defendant found that there was no visibility of the Victim L(the age of 19), M(the age of 19), etc. and that there was no visual view of the Victim M(the age of 19). As such, the Defendant was the victim who was suspected of having the Defendant as an embankment.