The prosecutor's appeal against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., e., e., e., 20,000 won for each of the defendants) declared by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. The judgment of this case: (a) Defendant B embezzled the stolen physical card from the Security Department; (b) Defendant A attempted to pay the food value with the above physical card that he received from Defendant B with the above physical card; (c) Defendant A is in conflict with his intention to commit an attempted crime; (d) Defendant B is also in conflict with his mistake; (c) Defendant B is also aware of his mistake and attempted not to repeat the same crime; (d) the amount of the Defendant A attempted to defraud is written and attempted to commit an attempted crime; and (e) Defendant A is in conflict with the attempted crime; and (e) other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of this case, including the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, criminal records, motive, means and consequence, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed to be unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is without merit and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.