logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.03.23 2018고단705
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A thief: (a) around 11:00 on January 20, 2018, the Defendant stolen eight articles worth KRW 27,380, in total, of KRW 27,380, including 1,700, 1, and 2,250, 1, and 27,380, 1, etc., of the market price, using the gaps in which the surveillance of the victim C was neglected in the Seoul Central District, Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and 426.

2. Counterfeiting a private signature and exercising a signature on the investigation;

A. The Defendant, at around 11:10 on January 20, 2018, at the same place as Paragraph 1, at the same time, was taken over as a current offender by E with the police box affiliated with the Seoul Southern Dongdaemun Police Station D, on account of the theft suspicion as above, he/she may be forced to leave Mongolia if he/she was punished.

I thought that it is F, one of the other's friendship F, signed in the column, which is the confirmation of the confirmation letter of the French rule notification, as F, with the color-shaped, and submitted the said confirmation letter to E who is aware of the fact.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising the right and exercised the forged signature of another person.

B. On January 20, 2018, around 14:20, the Defendant, at the Seoul Southern-gu Seoul Southern-gu Seoul Southern Police Station, signed “F” in the column for the statement of the suspect interrogation protocol as his relative F, and submitted the said protocol as if it was genuine to G members of the Seoul Southern-gu Police Station, the police officer in charge of such knowledge.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising the right and exercised the forged signature of another person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a report on internal investigation (one list of crimes and the return of goods), a copy of the receipt of a person committing an act in the line of duty, and confirmation (F);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 239 of the Criminal Act, regarding criminal facts.

arrow