A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 8, 2014, at around 04:55, the Defendant: (a) stated that “D restaurant” located in Suwon-si C, which was reported and sent to F and G, who are police officers belonging to the Suwon Police Station Estation, of the Suwon Police Station Estation, “f, f, f, f, f, f, in his hand, f, in his hand, was pushed down; (b) f, f, f, f, f, and f, f, f, f, f, and g, f, f, with a defect in order to locate G lock.

In this way, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Punishment] Basic Field of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the scope of territory and recommendation] - six months of imprisonment or one year and four months of imprisonment [general person] mitigation element - None of criminal punishment [decision of sentence] 2 years of the suspension of the execution of six months - The above sentencing factors and the degree of the obstruction of performance of official duties are not somewhat weak considering all circumstances, including the fact that the above sentencing factors and the degree of the obstruction of performance