beta
Text
Defendant
B The Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000, and a fine of KRW 900,000, respectively.
The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B is a person who won an election after going through the audit election of the D Agricultural Cooperative implemented on January 26, 2015.
No person shall provide money, etc. to members to have him/herself or a specific person elected as an executive of a local agricultural cooperative.
Defendant
B on January 26, 2015, around 07:05, at the one’s house located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si E, Defendant A called “F to receive money from her house,” and Defendant A conspired F to offer money and valuables to the elector in relation to the above audit election.
Accordingly, at around 07:30 on the same day, Defendant B asked Defendant A to deliver the same as above to Defendant B along with a support deposit, and 300,000 won in cash.
Thus, the defendant A, at around 09:00 on the same day, found the F's house located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si G, Changwon-si, and delivered KRW 300,000 in cash to the above F, along with the support table for the defendant B, going to the election of the auditor.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to offer money to the members to make the Defendant B elected in the election for executive officers of agricultural cooperatives.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Application of the interrogation protocol of each prosecutor's office and protocol of statement of the police to F;
1. Defendants of the relevant law on criminal facts: Articles 172 (1) 2 and 50 (1) 1 (a) of the Agricultural Cooperatives Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for negligence
1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: The reasons for the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are divided by persons who have contributed to their mistake, and the Defendants’ act seems not to have significantly affected the outcome of the instant election. However, the instant crime is established as a fair election culture by an act highly dangerous to seriously undermine the objectivity and fairness of the election.