Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Cheongju District Court 201Guhap1493, 02.02
Case Number of the previous trial
The early appellate court 201 Jeon 2676
Title
It cannot be readily concluded that the use of manufacturing facilities by another corporation is not the sales of the relevant corporation.
Summary
(1) It is difficult to readily conclude that the legal effect of the supply contract of ready-mixed concluded with the pertinent corporation is immediately reverted to another corporation solely on the ground that the pertinent corporation did not prepare an entrusted production contract, etc. for such production, even though it did not pay a separate fee or user fee for the production of ready-mixed using ready-mixed manufacturing facilities of another corporation.
Related statutes
Article 14 of the Framework Act on National Taxes
Cases
(Cheongju)Revocation of revocation of imposition of value added tax, etc. 2012Nu219
Plaintiff, Appellant
XX One other than a limited partnership company
Defendant, appellant and appellant
Director of the Tax Office
Judgment of the first instance court
Cheongju District Court Decision 201Guhap1493 Decided February 2, 2012
Conclusion of Pleadings
August 22, 2012
Imposition of Judgment
September 19, 2012
Text
1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
On June 1, 2010, the imposition of each corporate tax and value-added tax as stated in paragraph (1) among the details of the attached disposition imposed by the Defendant against Plaintiff XX limited partnership company, and the imposition of each value-added tax as stated in paragraph (2) among the details of the attached disposition imposed by the Defendant against Plaintiff O limited partnership company.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning for this Court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. Thus, the reasoning for this Court’s reasoning is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, under Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
O The 15th 1-2th 5th 1-2th 5th 1-2 of the first instance judgment "one hundred to twenty highest prices" shall be read as "ten to twenty highest prices", and the 5th 2th 5th 2 shall be read as "ten highest prices".
O The 13th written judgment of the first instance court shall be in attached Form 2 in attached Form 3.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, all of the plaintiffs' claims are reasonable, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal against the plaintiffs is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.