logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2020.4.3. 2020도2603 결정
가.특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)나.사기
Cases

A. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud)

(b) Fraud;

Defendant

A

Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Attorneys Fire-fighting (National Election)

Applicant for Compensation

B A.

The judgment below

Seoul High Court Decision 2019No1712 Decided February 6, 2020

Date of decision

April 3, 2020

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Of the judgment of the court below, "shall reverse the original judgment" shall be corrected to "shall reverse the part except the compensation order from among the original judgment".

Reasons

We examine the grounds of appeal.

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only a case on which death penalty, imprisonment with or without prison labor for an indefinite term or for not less than ten years has been pronounced, an appeal may be filed on the ground that the judgment of the court below had influenced

Therefore, in this case where a more minor sentence is rendered against the defendant, the court below's failure to make an incomplete deliberation, violation of the rules of evidence, and substantial fact-finding based on the judgment of the court below on the selection of evidence and probative value of evidence, or the misapprehension of the legal principle based on the facts found by the court below cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 380 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is evident that there is an error of omitting the entry of the part of the order for compensation in the court of first instance in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure. Thus,

April 3, 2020

Judges

Justices Kim Jae-hwan

Justices Noh Jeong-chul

Chief Justice Noh Jeong-hee

arrow