1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 3, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant under which the Plaintiff is acting as a travel business and an international marriage brokerage business, with the content that the Plaintiff would act as a broker for a travel and marriage with Vietnam women and receive KRW 14.9 million (hereinafter “instant contract”) (hereinafter “instant contract”), and on July 16, 2012, each letter and power of attorney, including the following provisions, from the Defendant (hereinafter “each letter of this case”).

7. Despite the Plaintiff’s sufficient notification, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit, complaint, petition, carbon, and civil petition with the intent to interfere with the Plaintiff’s business and honor, and the Plaintiff, while leading other customers abroad and participating in the same events during his/her stay in a foreign country, shall use a local tourr who became aware of each other to engage in direct marriage, or jointly exchange contact with the company with the other party, and jointly exchange and contact with the company for the purpose of interference with the Plaintiff’s business, and if the Plaintiff appears to have no serious suspicion, such as slandering the Plaintiff and asking for an interview, etc., he/she shall be punished for non-suspecting, and he/she shall be compensated for KRW 10 million without objection to the Plaintiff.

나. 피고는 2012. 7. 16. 원고와 함께 출국하여 베트남 하이퐁에서 베트남 여성들과 맞선을 진행한 결과 ‘C’이라는 베트남 여성과 현지에서 결혼식을 올린 후, 귀국하여 한국에서 혼인신고를 마쳤다가 2013. 8. 2. 이혼하였다.

C. After that, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to act as a broker for another international marriage pursuant to the instant contract. However, upon the Plaintiff’s refusal, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking refund of KRW 13.9 million of the instant brokerage commission (this court’s lawsuit). Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking payment of KRW 5.5 million of the penalty (this court’s lawsuit seeking payment of KRW 5.5 million of the penalty). However, this court dismissed all the principal lawsuit and counterclaim on June 3, 2014, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant were this court.