1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. According to the records on the legitimacy of the subsequent appeal, since the documents of lawsuit, including a copy of the complaint of the court of first instance, and the original copy of the judgment, were served to the Defendants by means of service by public notice, and the Defendants became aware of the fact that they were not aware of the lawsuit of this case and the judgment of the court of first instance, and submitted the subsequent subsequent appeal within two weeks, the appeal of this case is lawful.

2. Basic facts

A. The Defendants are running an international marriage brokerage business with the trade name of “F” as both husband and wife.

B. On May 30, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into an international marriage brokerage agreement between Defendant B and Defendant B, which provides that Defendant B shall act as a broker for marriage with Vietnamese women, and the Plaintiff shall pay the brokerage expenses. The Plaintiff entered into an international marriage brokerage agreement between Defendant B and G, a Vietnamese woman, as the broker of Defendant B, and completed the marriage report on June 27, 201.

However, after G filed a divorce lawsuit against G with the Seoul Family Court, the Plaintiff filed a divorce lawsuit against G, and filed a divorce report on March 19, 2013.

C. On September 22, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into an international marriage brokerage agreement (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with Defendant B, which provides that Defendant B shall act as a broker for marriage with Vietnamese women, and the Plaintiff shall pay nine million won at its brokerage expense. The instant agreement includes the following contents (hereinafter “instant special agreement”).

It promises to refund marriage expenses at the time of an accident within two years after marriage in the case of re-marriage.

Provided, That it is necessary to take measures so that the plaintiff's workplace can live in the nearest area of the plaintiff's workplace after marriage.

As between September 22, 2013 and October 10, 2013, the Plaintiff paid nine million won to the Defendants for brokerage expenses under the instant contract.

E. The Plaintiff, as a broker of the Defendants, got married with H, a Vietnam national female, Vietnam, and H on March 2014.