1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 11, 2006, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Skistan”), a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, and changed the status of stay to the status of non-professional employment (E-9) on one occasion on July 26, 2006, and had the status of stay extended on one occasion, and had the status of stay extended on May 29, 2009. On May 28, 2009, the Plaintiff re-entered the Republic of Korea for the status of non-professional employment (E-9) (E-9) for three times, and had the period of stay expired ( July 27, 2012), and applied for recognition of refugee to the Defendant on July 26, 2012.

(hereinafter “instant refugee application”). B.

On January 10, 2014, the defendant rejected the refugee application of this case on the ground that the plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the plaintiff would suffer persecution" as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

(See Evidence No. 1-1, hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”).

On February 3, 2014, the Plaintiff raised an objection against the instant disposition to the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed it on September 30, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the Plaintiff’s assertion that it is a hydrophaber Pakunkhwa and a hydropha from Jehala’s origin. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a hydropha nitropha.

From around 2005, the Plaintiff supported Awami NP (hereinafter referred to as “NP”) from around 2005, and was engaged in political activities, such as Gucers, when there is an NP meeting. On January 201, when staying in the Republic of Korea, the Plaintiff joined the NP member and visited the party’s office.