1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 10, 2006, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Pakistan with the nationality of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Skistan”), and entered the Republic of Korea with the status of industrial training (D-3) on October 25, 2007, changed the status of stay into the status of non-professional employment (E-9) on October 25, 2007, left the Republic of Pakistan on September 24, 2009, and returned to the Republic of Korea on September 13, 2009, again returned to the Republic of Korea for the extension of the period of stay three times on September 13, 2009, while staying in the Republic of Korea, and applied for the recognition of refugee on November 5, 2012, which was earlier than seven days before the expiration of the period of stay (E-9 on November 12, 2012).

(hereinafter “instant refugee application”). B.

On June 11, 2014, the defendant rejected the refugee application of this case on the ground that the plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the plaintiff would suffer persecution" as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

(See Evidence No. 1-1, hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”).

On June 19, 2014, the Plaintiff raised an objection against the instant disposition to the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed it on September 30, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the Plaintiff’s claim that is a hydroskhunkhwa and a hydrosphere nitropha from the regional origin, which is a hydrosphere nitropha.

The Plaintiff’s Republic of Korea prohibited free will. The Plaintiff’s South East Eastern B (hereinafter “B”) left the Republic of Korea on June 4, 2012 with female her husband and her family. As a result, the female her family members in B, who had fighting between female her family and the Plaintiff’s family members, have her family members.