logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.01.29 2014구합19407
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 10, 2006, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Skistan”), entered the Republic of Korea as a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Skistan”), and stayed in the Republic of Korea by changing the status of stay for non-professional employment (E-9) into the status of stay for industrial training (D-3) on October 10, 2006, and went to the Republic of Pakistan on October 1, 2009. On December 18, 2009, the Plaintiff re-entered the Republic of Korea to the status of non-professional employment (E-9), and applied for the recognition of refugee to the Defendant on October 29, 2012.

(hereinafter “instant refugee application”). B.

On February 6, 2014, the defendant rejected the refugee application of this case on the ground that the plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the plaintiff would suffer persecution" as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

(See Evidence No. 1-1, hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”).

On February 24, 2014, the Plaintiff raised an objection against the instant disposition to the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed it on September 26, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff contributed 10,000 punjb to build a church at the request of B and C, a village owner, who stayed in the Republic of Korea, and visited Punjistan at the request of B and C on October 2009.

On the other hand, D (D; hereinafter “D”) operated food at the Plaintiff’s home in the market of Qazia Abad, Qbadd (Abad). However, on November 2009, when the Plaintiff came to have more than once money in the Republic of Korea, D (D; hereinafter “D”), the police and the Sishas-Aba-Jangba- equipment (Laskar-Jangba), which is an armed organization, around November 2009.

arrow