logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.05.18 2017고정1430
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a lodging facility "D" on the second floor of the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Central Government.

1. No person shall arrange sexual traffic for business purposes, in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts;

Nevertheless, on May 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on May 30, 2017, E in the above D.

The term "a person who is called "a person" has an infant;

While receiving 40,00 won for sexual traffic and providing guidance to 208 heading rooms and arranging sexual traffic women FF to pay 20,000 won for sexual traffic.

2. He/she shall not arrange sexual traffic at a public morals and business place in violation of the Customs and Business Act.

Nevertheless, the summary of the evidence that the defendant arranged sexual traffic in D, such as the statement in paragraph 1.

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Partial statement of the witness F;

1. Each non-control report;

1. Application of field photographs and CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes at the control site;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, concerning facts constituting an offense (the occupation of a business mediating commercial sex acts) and Articles 10 (1) and 3 subparagraph 1 of the same Act (the occupation of an act mediating commercial sex acts, such as arranging commercial sex acts at a custom office);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion of the investigation into a vessel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment

The term "incrimination" refers to an investigation method in which an investigative agency, for a person who does not have the original criminal intent, thereby inducing a crime by means of deception or attack, etc., and arresting the criminal. Thus, if a person who has the criminal intent is given an opportunity to commit a crime to a person or made it easy to commit a crime, it cannot be deemed a naval investigation (Supreme Court Decision 2004Do1066 Decided May 14, 2004). The reason and method of regulating the female lodging of this case, which can be known by the evidence of the judgment, and the defendant's attitude at the time.

arrow