The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In determining the facts, the Defendant merely caused the victim’s face one time by hand, and did not prevent the victim’s face from driving away. The injury suffered by the victim is not caused by the Defendant’s assault.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, namely, the injury diagnosis report and nursing log prepared by the E Hospital H, etc., the victim visited the E Hospital on the day of the instant case and was hospitalized after a diagnosis that requires a diagnosis by a medical specialist in the case of injury, injury, and satise in the face. ② On March 12, 2016, the following day of the instant case, the victim visited the I Hospital to treat the satise at the I Hospital. On April 1, 2016, the victim visited the hospital again, and was diagnosed by a 4 satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise sat.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. The defendant was in the period of suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime, and the defendant was sentenced to a fine and a suspended sentence of imprisonment on several occasions due to the same crime.