The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The injury of a victim of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles does not need to be treated, and such injury does not constitute an injury under the Criminal Act, and even if such injury constitutes a family injury, the Defendant did not recognize the fact that the victim suffered the injury, and thus, is

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 6 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below on the assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles reveals the following circumstances, which can be revealed by the evidence legitimately adopted and investigated by the court below. ① The defendant, at the time of the accident, i.e., the part of the victim's bicycle riding along the bicycle track with pedestrian signal, was faced with the front part of the victim's bicycle riding along the bicycle signal. The victim's bicycle was shocked with the front wheels, and the part of the hand was breath, and the victim's face was faced with the defendant's vehicle. The victim's face fell into India. The victim's breath of the victim's face was faced with the victim's right stringer, and the victim's shock was deemed to have been considerably shocked at the time of the accident. ② The victim was asked by the investigative agency to the effect that the victim was faced with the face of an earthquake, and the body was frightd with the victim's body and the victim was examined by the police hospital immediately after the accident.