Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:50 on March 24, 2018, the injured party B proposed that he will take the vehicle to F (n, 22 years of age) and G while driving the Elater's car on the road in front of the D cafeteria located in the Full-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Self-Governing Province, and that he was in contact with F (n, 22 years of age) and G, and that he was under contact with the above F (i.e., a male-friendly job with the Defendant of the above G while drinking alcohol together.

At around 02:00 on March 24, 2018, the Defendant heard from F the background leading up to entering the road in front of the said Iju point, and took a bath to the victim B (the age of 41) on his hand, and boomed the victim’s breath with a bridge, and boomed the bridge, and boomed the breath of the breath, thereby damaging the victim’s booming the breath to the floor, thereby leaving the booming the breath of the boom and

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect against J by prosecution;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to injury diagnosis certificates and photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. On October 16, 2015, the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order: (a) Defendant committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period after having been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year for fraud in this court in this court; (b) Defendant committed the instant crime despite having been sentenced to one-time punishment for violent crime around 2013; or (c) repeating the instant crime despite being punished one time for violent crime, etc., which is unfavorable to the Defendant; (b) the Defendant recognized the instant facts charged; (c) expressed the victim’s intent to reflect the mistake; (d) the victim, while misrepresenting the public prosecutor, was the wind, and there is some room for somewhat taking into account the motive or circumstance of causing the instant crime to be committed and the degree of injury to the victim.

The age, character and conduct, environment, and environment of the defendant.