beta
Text
Defendant
A A Fine of 200,000 won, Defendant B of 300,000 won, Defendant C of 50,000 won, and Defendant C of .
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants, as the occupants of the Bupyeong-gu G Apartment-gu G Apartment, have raised an objection to the “public bid case of the entrusted management company of multi-family housing” deliberated by the victims’ G Apartment-gu Council composed of the representatives, etc. of the above apartment. In order to prevent them from opening the tender documents of the participating companies.
1. On February 18, 2013, the Defendant rejected the return of approximately 20 minutes in the second floor office of the above apartment management office (Defendant C) around February 18, 2013, at around 21:29, the Defendant attended a meeting for the resolution of the above agenda held by the victim to open the tender documents of the participating company while maintaining the progress of the meeting. The Defendant rejected the return of approximately 20 minutes by entering the audience gallery with all bid documents on the consignee of the meeting room at the audience gallery and holding the meeting room.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's resolution on multi-family housing management by force.
2. On February 27, 2013, Defendants A, C, D, and E (Defendant A, C, and D) were at the same place from February 27, 2013 to February 21:200, the victim’s meeting for resolution on the above agenda was resumed to open the tender documents of the participating company as referred to in the preceding paragraph. Defendant A, B, and C had an objection to the passage of 20 minutes by continuing to sit or sit at the representative meeting from the seat to the seat of the said representative meeting, despite the Plaintiff’s interview of H, Defendant A, B, and C were forced to cut off the open tender documents and the bid documents cited by Defendant C from the said 10 representative representative to the public tender documents. Defendant C also opened the tender documents with the joint signature of Defendant C, which had been held by the said I, to the public tender documents.