Defendant

A, B, C, and D shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000, and Defendant E shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00.

The defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B, “2016 High 441,” was the auditor dismissed from the partnership for reconstruction of G apartment housing, Defendant D, A, and C are the directors of the said partnership, and Defendant E is the members of the said partnership.

On March 3, 2016, the Defendants conspired to ensure that meetings of representatives do not normally take place in relation to the “duty suspension of dismissed directors and auditors” among the 41 council agenda of the 41 council of representatives of the said association, which was conducted within the office of the G Apartment Association in the Hasan-si, H and the 3th floor of the Dosan-si.

Accordingly, Defendant B interfered with the progress of the meeting by sounding a large sound behind the meeting room, Defendant D was pushed down to prevent representatives from going out at the entrance of the meeting room, Defendant A and Defendant C from getting out of the meeting room. Defendant A and Defendant C were unable to interfere with the disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as blocking representatives from getting out of the meeting room, interfering with the progress of the meeting by putting a large sound behind the meeting room and obstructing the progress of the meeting.

Ultimately, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the affairs of the board of representatives of the Housing Reconstruction Project Association by force.

Defendant E, “2016 High 471, a member of the Gunsan-si G Housing Reconstruction Association, the victim I who is the president of the said association and the spoco construction, proposed removal of the executive officers of the said association in the course of conflict of opinions between the union members, and sent letters to the union members on behalf of the creditors in the provisional disposition lawsuit against prohibition of holding a general assembly (former District Court Gunsan Branch 2016Kahap 9) to prevent this.

In order to impair the honor of victims and insult them.

Accordingly, Defendant E: (a) around January 19, 2016, Defendant E: (b) around “All members of the group of members farb G.h.

Jinari to the proposal of the hospitalization General Assembly

I. Doz. I. Doz.

The State of G is the owner of us

“A number of members of the association” and “the crisis of our apartment.”

The head of the partnership shall be the City Corporation in a single group.