The defendant shall be innocent.

1. No person who is the summary of the facts charged in this case shall engage in any business which disturbs public morals by allowing male and female juveniles to sleep together with them;

Nevertheless, on December 25, 2015, from around 01:00 to 02:00, the Defendant, at the Cheongju-si Cheongju-si Cheongju-si, combinedly accommodated E (n, 18 years old) and F (35 years old) from the “D hotel” inside the “D hotel” conference located in the Cheongju-si Cheongju-si c.

2. In a case where there are circumstances to suspect that a person engaged in a judgment-based leisure business is a juvenile on the outer features, habitss, or shots of the persons who intend to be sexually married, the person should be allowed to be sexually married only if it is confirmed by identification card or any other reliable method and only if it is confirmed that a juvenile is not a juvenile. If the person allowed to be sexually divorced without confirmation as above, at least the juvenile had dolusent intention on the sexually married marriage.

In light of the above legal principles, in order to recognize the defendant's willful negligence with respect to the juvenile sexual intercourse, the defendant should be aware that a specific person who is likely to be suspected as a juvenile in the above telecom, intends to have a sexual intercourse, or is able to have a sexual intercourse. In light of the above legal principles, the defendant should be aware that he/she is able to be suspected as a juvenile in the above telecom, or that he/she is able to have a sexual intercourse.

In full view of the following circumstances revealed in the record, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt that the defendant knew the fact that E, a juvenile, intends to make a sexual intercourse in the above telecom, or that the above fact of sexual intercourse is not permissible.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(1) The defendant is sitting and standing up on the second floor of the above telecom, with the entrance right door on the left side of the telecom, has an elevator on the more remote side, and the entrance and the elevator are larger than the key of E between the entrance and the elevator.